jotaiのatom、状態変更する部分をコンポーネントから分離してstore.set(...)でやればいいように思うがどうだろう

クソ重編集ソフトに嫌気がさしたのでこれ
PCならAudacityがあるけどね

波形表示のあるソフト、低音域のエネルギーに埋もれて高音域の時間変化が見れないという愚を犯し続けている

https://github.com/pmndrs/jotai/discussions/1405
https://github.com/pmndrs/jotai/blob/main/src/react/useSetAtom.ts#L29
うーむ…atomが変化した場合にsetterを再計算する必要性がわからん。Contextの入れ替えによるsetAtomの追従というコンセプトはわかる（それが必要かはともかく）
そのためにuseSetAtomがHooksになりrender外で呼べなくなるのは損に思う

@astro_ray I think even if you fail sometimes, your consistent awareness of avoiding misdirected spending has still made significant differences. A 100% recall and 100% precision filter doesn't exist, so we must take it easy.

There are people who show off their illness or wasteful spending as a form of self-expression. I believe these forms of artificial failure or intentional abandonment of progress are unwise and should be avoided. However, how I fail naturally reflects very much who I am, since failures are adorable byproducts of the design of the imperfect 'filter,' born from desires and acquired orientations of attention, or the tangible sense of self.

理由を表す"since"と"for"の意味の違いについてChatGPTと話している。
ChatGPTくんは私の考えをリフレクトしているだけなのだがそんなに外れてもいないと思う

In the case of an excuse, using "for" can indeed carry a different connotation—one of definitiveness and assertiveness. When you use "for" in an excuse (e.g., "I was late for a reason"), it emphasizes the certainty of the reason, and in a way, it can act as a shield against possible refutation. It places the reasoning as a solid, unarguable fact, much like closing a door on further debate.

So, your understanding of "for" in that context is absolutely right: it's not just a connector, but a way to assert that the reason is valid and should not be questioned. This works well in situations where you're trying to ensure that the explanation is seen as sufficient, like when you're giving an excuse for being late. The implication is that the reason is enough, and any further challenge to it would seem unnecessary or out of place.

In contrast, "since" in more reflective or philosophical contexts (like the one in your paragraph about failure and identity) keeps the conversation open-ended. It invites interpretation and leaves space for nuance, implying that the reason provided is just one part of a broader inquiry rather than an irrefutable explanation.

So, both words serve different rhetorical purposes depending on whether you're trying to assert a reason as absolute (with "for") or reflect on it as part of a larger, more fluid discussion (with "since").

話し方が気に食わないときにit's so newspaper and unenjoyableなどと

Chatting should always be enjoyable although there is enjoyment manywise

英語圏の投稿は文中にhashtagつきの言葉を織り込む投稿が良くあるので使いまくるとuglyというのはそう

@noellabo@fedibird.com 最近ユーザー設定でこういうのができました

storage pressureでブラウザのストレージが吹き飛ぶの勘弁してほしい
ブラウザのストレージ消したところで全然空き容量なんか増えないのに

why

https://web-audiomixer.pages.dev/
簡単なマルチトラック音声編集ツールができた
音源を重ねる、時間合わせ、トリミングなど
ダブルタップでカーソルを移動
クリップを切断するためには、対象を選択肢してからカーソルを合わせて「分割」